Last week was a controversial time. Two situations arose that really got me thinking. Your thoughts and input is particularly welcomed on this post.
Firstly I’m on an emailing list for a group called OUTRES. This is a group of around 270 people who have an interest in outdoor education research. There are a lot of pracademics within the group. These are people with a practical background but who teach or lecture in some aspect of outdoor education.
The group has been very quiet recently. Whether it was because there was nothing to say or too many exciting things happening I’m not quite sure. Anyway suddenly a question appeared on the scene that got more emails flying around than pigeons at a bread fest.
The question asked “What are the most controversial issues in outdoor education?”
The discussions and comments were wide-ranging and included: the “shallow rooted theoretical base” of outdoor education (OE); the predictability of outcomes in activities and lack of emergent learning; whether OE needs to be child-led or provider-led; inclusivity and identity within OE; how and if OE responds to climate change; what exactly is OE; the use of Western evaluation tools in non-Western countries; the challenges faced by OE becoming more mainstream education practice; standards in OE; the value of OE as a career choice; decreasing passion within OE; the separation of self from place; OE and thrill seeking; neo-experiential education; who needs to be licensed and badged; bridging the gap between research and practice; what is the outdoors?; who cares what the controversial issues are in OE?
All of the above are valid points and important issues. The emails were great to read. Yet, none of them jump out at me as truly controversial. Almost everyone agreed and saw the reasoning behind each question. I always think that controversy arises when there is a moral issue at stake which creates an emotional response. Often the arguments are between decisions and actions where one has to choose between what’s right and what’s right, rather than between what’s right and what’s wrong.
But the situation became more complex. A passerby (purportedly) noticed the child and decided that he needed rescuing. She jumped over a locked gate, failed to check with the school what was happening and then was impolite to a staff member who approached her. Thus a few days later, she was issued with a notice about trespassing on school property. And that’s when the stooshie began because the passerby took the story to the national tabloid press.
There were hundreds of responses on the Daily Mail website and tens of responses on Lenore’s blog. The school was completely shocked by the interest in the incident by the national press and stunned by the increasingly wilder interpretations of the story. It issued letters publicly on the matter to explain what had happened. I got “Twitter rapped” (Twapped!) for one tweet that flagged up the story. This involved a couple of people tweeting me and telling me off for considering the story as controversial. In my opinion, a controversial issue is one there is a lot of public, prolonged and heated disagreement over a matter. I stand my ground!
This story immediately hit me on several emotional accounts. I found myself quite caught up in the story as I’ve had experience of all three situations.
Several weeks ago I rescued a boy of a similar age from a tree as I was passing by. I saw him up the tree, smiled and mentioned that he must be able to see lots. He shook his head and looked upset. So I asked him if he was okay. Again he shook his head. Then I checked to see if he was stuck and he nodded. So I offered to help him down. At this point he nodded so I went round to the other side of the fence and helped him by encouraging him to dangle his legs down and jump. I told him that my hands were ready to catch him should he fall. The boy jumped, landed and then rushed off home. I continued on my dog walk.
As a head teacher I had one child who moved from another school into Primary 7 with “trouble” tattooed on his forehead. He was very physically able, funny and smart. One break time he opted to get out of a “telling off” by climbing up a tree. By the time I arrived on the scene, he was almost at the top. Luckily he complied with my request to climb down and we quietly followed up the matter without any ado. However boy could have easily decided to stay up there for a while.
I also know what it is like to have tabloid press pass comment upon a school. I’ve had reporters hanging around outside school gates trying to eek responses out of parents on a particular matter. Fortunately, no parent was prepared to comment or had anything negative to say.
At any point my own actions and decisions in any of the above could have been interpreted as unacceptable and resulted in a controversy. Each incident creates an internal dilemma as my “What If…?” mindset kicks in and I begin to catastrophise. So for me, this story strikes at the heart of all the concerns, issues and angst that so many adults have about being responsible for children outside. Moving from the state of fear to freedom is a big step. How can we make this happen – or is that a controversial issue too?